Dr.Laxman Balakrishna Joshi v. Dr. Trimbak Babu Godbole AIR 1969 SC 128 : A.he owes a duty of care in deciding whether to undertake the case, B. he owes a duty of care in deciding what treatment to give and, C. he owes a duty of...

Supreme Court has held that in a suit filed for possession and declaration that he is the owner of the suit land based on title cannot succeed unless he is held to have some title over the land. The main relief is of possession and, therefore,...

Use of word “from” in s. 138(a) of NI Act requires exclusion of first day on which cheque was drawn and inclusion of last day within which such act needs to be done: R.A. Joshi Vs S. Of Gujarat..AIR 2014SC 1554

Victim need not obtain leave for filing appeal against acquittal, it should be dealt as a regular appeal, reiterates:Supreme Court Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice KM Joseph in Naval Kishore Mishra Vs State of U.P. & Ors. 

Breaking News: CBI Raids Home and Offices of Senior Advocates Indira Jaising and Anand Grover:source

Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v State of Maharashtra (2014) had held that the place, situs or venue of judicial inquiry and trial of the offence under Section 139 NI  Act must be restricted to where the drawee bank, is located.

The law laid by Delhi High Court in S.P. Gupta Vs State 2005 AD Delhi in Paragraphs 11 and 13 is clear on the point that any citizen can approach the court/police for investigation of the cognizable offence. 

PARBATBHAI AAHIR @ PARBATBHAI BHIMSINHBHAI KARMUR AND ORS VS STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.: The Supreme Court discussed various precedents on the subject summarised the following points/propositions in relation to section 482 for FIR Quashing…. Read Judgement

Youth Bar Association of India Vs Union of India and Others… (1) An accused is entitled to get a copy of the First Information Report at an earlier stage than as prescribed under Section 207 of the Cr.P.C. (b) An accused who has reasons to suspect that he has...

Hon’ble Delhi High Court (Hariprakash Case 2015 1 AD Delhi) is clear on the point that at the stage of framing charge evidence is not to be evaluated.